Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tlaib v. Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2024cv02739
Plaintiff:
Mohamad Tlaib
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Tlaib v. Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2023cv13840
Plaintiff:
Mohamad Tlaib
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Tlaib v. Chattem, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Mohamad Tlaib
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MOHAMAD v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS
as 2:2019cv16576
Plaintiff:
MOHAMAD MOHAMAD
Defendant:
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS
In Re:
AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLECTION AGENCY, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLECTION AGENCY, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
as 2:2019md02904
Defendant:
OPTUM360, LLC, QUEST DIAGNOSTIC INCORPORATED, LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS and others
Plaintiff:
JORGE M FERNANDEZ, JR., FRANCIS CARBONNEAU, MARK JOHNSTON and others
In Re:
AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLECTION AGENCY, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Ashley Jilek and LaTorrie Glover-Brown
Special Master:
HON. MARK FALK, USMJ (RET.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Holmes v. Ajram
as 1:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
William Holmes
Defendant:
Mohamad Ajram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Comercializadora Recmaq Limitada v. Hollywood Auto Mall, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00945
Plaintiff:
Comercializadora Recmaq Limitada
Defendant:
Hollywood Auto Mall, LLC, Mohamad Reza Ghasemi and Jaime Sotomayor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaafarani v. Chase Home Finance, LLC
as 2:2009cv12491
Plaintiff:
Mohamad Kaafarani
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC, Chase Home Finance, LLC, Chase Home Finance, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Type:
Torts - Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
