Cases 1 - 10 of 34
MOHR v. MAVIS TIRE SUPPLY LLC
as 2:2023cv04911
Defendant:
MAVIS TIRE SUPPLY LLC also known as MAVIS TIRE NY LLC doing business as JACK WILLIAMS TIRE & AUTO CENTERS and MAVIS TIRE NY LLC
Plaintiff:
JOHN MOHR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
McCOLLUM v. GOETTLER et al
as 2:2023cv01658
Plaintiff:
PORTIA McCOLLUM
Defendant:
MICHAEL GOETTLER, W. DON CORNWELL, ROBERT J. COURY and others
Not Classified By Court:
VIATRIS, INC.
MASTERS v. GOETTLER et al
as 2:2023cv01553
Plaintiff:
DON MASTERS
Defendant:
MICHAEL GOETTLER, W. DON CORNWELL, ROBERT J. COURY and others
Not Classified By Court:
Viatris Inc.
Crawford v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Crawford
Defendant:
Dauphin County, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Warden Gregory Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCHEINER v. GOETTLER et al
as 2:2023cv01446
Plaintiff:
JACOB SCHEINER
Defendant:
MICHAEL GOETTLER, W. DON CORNWELL, ROBERT J. COURY and others
MOHR v. THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2023cv00731
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHON MOHR
Defendant:
THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MOHR v. PENCHISHEN et al
as 5:2022cv03458
Petitioner:
PATRICK MOHR
Respondent:
DAVID PENCHISHEN, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, MICHAEL ACEVEDO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JUSTICE, II v. PLANTRONICS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01861
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Justice, II and JEFFREY D. JUSTICE, II.
Defendant:
PLANTRONICS, INC., ROBERT C HAGERTY, MARV TSEU and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Mohr v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv01057
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Mohr
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
OSWALD v. MOHR et al
as 2:2017cv03795
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN OSWALD
Defendant:
KATHERINE MOHR and WILLIAM FOSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
