Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Smith v. Hochul
as 24-575
Plaintiff:
KEN SMITH
Defendant:
KATHY HOCHUL, Governer of New York, DANIEL F. MARTUSCELLO, Commissioner of DOCCS and MOLLY WASOW PARKS, Commissioner of DDS/DHS
Carter v. Wasow Parks
as 24-298
Petitioner:
DARRYL C. CARTER
Respondent:
MOLLY WASOW PARKS, Commissioner of New York City Department of New York City Department of Social Services and Human Resources Administration
Carter v. Park, et al
as 1:2023cv10887
Plaintiff:
Darryl C. Carter
Defendant:
Molly Wasow Park and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj Declaratory Judgment
Smith v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv01436
Plaintiff:
Ken Smith
Defendant:
Kathleen C. Hochul, Daniel F. Martuscello, III and Molly Wasow Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hochul et al
as 1:2023cv09865
Plaintiff:
Ken Smith
Defendant:
Kathleen C. Hochul, Daniel F. Martuscello, III and Molly Wasow Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hochul et al
as 1:2023cv09876
Plaintiff:
Ken Smith
Defendant:
Kathleen C. Hochul, Daniel F. Martuscello, III and Molly Wasow Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Hochul et al
as 1:2023cv09528
Plaintiff:
Khaliq Alim Anderson
Defendant:
Gov. Kathy Hochul, William J. Hochul, Gov. Andrew Coumo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Nixon v. Park
as 1:2023cv06916
Plaintiff:
Elsabasz M. Nixon, M.N. and I.N.
Defendant:
Molly Wasow Park and Eric Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander v. Gleeson et al
as 1:2023cv05663
Plaintiff:
Owen Marlon Alexander
Defendant:
Andreea Gleeson, TuneCore Inc., Devon Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
