Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Michel v. Mayo Clinic
as 0:2022cv02375
Plaintiff:
Monica Michel
Defendant:
Mayo Clinic
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv10740
Plaintiff:
MONICA MICHELLE EVANS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv08852
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MONICA MICHELLE BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monica Michelle Obannon v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2021cv00307
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Monica Michelle Obannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PRIDGEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv79876
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MONICA MICHELLE PRIDGEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREEMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv69150
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MONICA MICHELLE FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzales v. Saul
as 5:2020cv00491
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Monica Michelle Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02451
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Monica Michelle Obannon v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2019cv03362
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Monica Michelle Obannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Chiang et al v. DNA Carriers, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02749
Plaintiff:
Paul N Chiang, Monica M Chiang and Monica Michelle Chiang
Defendant:
Aziz M. Fayzullaev, DNA Carriers, Inc., Progressive Carriers, Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
