Cases 61 - 70 of 153
First Mercury Insurance Company v. Monitronics International, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv04381
Plaintiff:
First Mercury Insurance Company
Defendant:
Monitronics International, Inc. , Alliance Security, Inc. , ISI Alarms, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Worsham v. Alliance Security, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01285
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Worsham
Defendant:
Alliance Security, Inc. and Monitronics International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams v. Monitronic International, Inc.
as 6:2016cv00626
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Adams
Defendant:
Monitronic International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Monitronics International Inc v. First Mercury Insurance Company
as 3:2016cv00960
Plaintiff:
Monitronics International Inc
Defendant:
First Mercury Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abante Rooter and Plumbing, Inc. et al v. Alarm.com Incorporated et al
as CAN/4:15-cv-06314
Plaintiff:
Abante Rooter and Plumbing, Inc. , George Ross Manesiotis , Mark Hankins and others
Defendant:
Alarm.com Incorporated , Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. and Monitronics International, Inc.
Susan Hurst v. Monitronics International, Inc
as 16-11177
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SUSAN HURST, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
MONITRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Worsham v. Monitronics International, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00600
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Worsham
Defendant:
Monitronics International, Inc. and Alliance Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Phelps v. Monitronics International, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
Marc Phelps
Defendant:
Monitronics International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Monitronics International, Inc. v. ADT, LLC
as 1:2016mc00017
Movant:
Monitronics International, Inc.
Respondent:
ADT, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
