Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Monogram Food Solutions, LLC v. Great American Foods, Inc. d/b/a Pik-Nik Foods, USA
as 2:2024cv02425
Plaintiff:
Monogram Food Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Great American Foods, Inc. d/b/a Pik-Nik Foods, USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Monogram Aerospace Fasteners, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv05435
Plaintiff:
Los Angeles Waterkeeper
Defendant:
Monogram Aerospace Fasteners, Inc., TriMas Corp., Trimas Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Su v. Monogram Food Solutions, LLC et al
as 0:2023cv02007
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Monogram Food Solutions, LLC, Monogram Management Services, Inc. and Monogram Meat Snacks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
