Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Columbia Mutual Insurance Company v. 5566 Furnishings, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Columbia Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
5566 Furnishings, LLC, AF, LLC, Benjamin C. Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Moody v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Moody
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Moody v. Unknown Defendants
as 1:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Kenneth M. Moody
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aircon Corporation v. JT Construction, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00393
Plaintiff:
Aircon Corporation
Defendant:
JT Construction, LLC, Jerry T. Kittrell, Bo Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moody v. John Doe
as 3:2021cv00727
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Moody
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv00281
Defendant:
Kenneth Wayne Smith, John Does 1-10 and Kimberly Smith doing business as Pro Cars
Plaintiff:
Naomi Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moody v. Life Help Mental Health et al
as 4:2021cv00050
Plaintiff:
Carol Moody
Defendant:
Angela Carter, Life Help Mental Health and Rosie Brownlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McFarland v. Lee County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2020cv00064
Defendant:
Cheif, Johnny Patterson, Saltillo Emergency Dispatch Service 911 and others
Plaintiff:
Takei Gurmeani McFarland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
