Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 789
Zaerpour v. UBS Group AG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv07232
Plaintiff: Scheil Zaerpour and Soheil Zaerpour
Defendant: UBS Group AG, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re Morgan Stanley Data Security Litigation
as 22-1819
Plaintiff: Richard Grossman, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin Behar, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Amy Dalton, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Amresh Jaijee, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Sylvia Tillman, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Vivian Yates, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC
Appellant: Steven F. Helfand
Nayani v. LifeStance Health Group, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv06833
Plaintiff: Nizar S. Nayani
Defendant: LifeStance Health Group, Inc., Michael K. Lester, J. Michael Bruff and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Lian v. Tuya Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv06792
Plaintiff: Xiaomeng Lian
Defendant: Tuya Inc., Xueji (Jerry) Wang, Liaohan (Leo) Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv06141
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carpenter v. Oscar Health, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03885
Plaintiff: Lorin Carpenter
Defendant: Oscar Health, Inc., Mario Schlosser, Siddhartha Sankaran and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In re: Michael Krueger
as 22-1067
Petitioner: Michael Krueger
Respondent: Michael Merson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Zhang Zhenming, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and others
In re: Treasury Securities Auc
as 22-943
Plaintiff: Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Marc Federighi, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Michael St. John, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System, On behalf of itself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: BMO Capital Markets Corp., CIBC World Markets Corp., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and others
City of Providence, Rhode v. Bats Global Markets, Inc.
as 22-920
Plaintiff: Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, Forsta AP-fonden, StateBoston Retirement System and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: City of Providence, Rhode Island, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Employees' Retirement System of the Government of the Virgin Islands, United Association National Pension Fund and others
Defendant: Wedbush Securities, Inc., Tradework Inc., Bids Trading, L.P. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., Direct Edge ECN, L.L.C., The Nasdaq Stock Market L.L.C. and others
Woitovich v. Schoenfeld et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01742
Plaintiff: Rhonda Woitovich
Defendant: Lydia Schoenfeld and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?