Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2022
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richardson-Bright v. US Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2022cv00274
Defendant:
Morgan State, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Vinay Singh and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Richardson-Bright and Kathaleen Richardson-Bright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1315
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michele Williams v. Morgan State University
as 21-1918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELE WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY and DEWAYNE WICKHAM, in his personal capacity
Wolfe v. United States et al
as 1:2021cv01278
Defendant:
,, United States, Morgan State University, Khaliyah Turner Inc Saka and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Mwabira-Simera v. Morgan State University
as 21-1283
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN BANKS, Vice President Student Affairs, STACEY BENN, Vice President for Finance and Management, DAVID WILSON, President of Morgan State University and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL H. MWABIRA-SIMERA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02715
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edward Danial v. Morgan State University
as 20-1891
Defendant / Appellee:
MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD J. DANIAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
