Cases 1 - 10 of 130
OTEY et al v. KRASNER et al
as 2:2024cv02205
Petitioner:
DENISE OTEY, LAWRENCE OTEY, GWENDOLYN GREEN and others
Respondent:
LAWRENCE KRASNER, ADA JONATHAN FRISBY and JUDGE SCOTT DICLAUDIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MOSLEY v. STARBUCKS
as 2:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
STARBUCKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
MOSLEY v. CIPRIANI & WERNER, PC. et al
as 2:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
CIPRIANI & WERNER, PC. and SALVATORE VILARDI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOSLEY v. YOUNG
as 2:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
BRIAN YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MOSLEY v. WELLS FARGO SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR
as 2:2023cv04669
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR, WELLS FARGO and SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MOSLEY v. STARBUCK CORP. et al
as 2:2023cv04000
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
STARBUCK CORP., SALVATORE VILARDI, CIPRIANI WERNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOSLEY v. BARTLE et al
as 2:2023cv04169
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
HARVEY BARTLE, III, L. FELIPE RESTREPO, FLOYD J. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSLEY v. BAGNATO
as 2:2023cv02996
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER BAGNATO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOSLEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv02248
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and DANIEL J. ANDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
