Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Diaz v. Miami Dade Board Commissioners et al
as 1:2019cv24328
Defendant:
Mr. Soto, Pepe Diaz, Miami Dade Board Commissioners and others
Plaintiff:
Danize Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Felder v. Martinez et al
as 1:2016cv10873
Plaintiff:
Antoine Felder
Defendant:
Mr. Martinez, Linda Kemp and The Doctor Assigned to Division 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamartine v. Martinez
as 4:2016mc01094
Plaintiff:
Tchana Lamartine
Defendant:
Mr. Martinez
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Pickett v. Peter et al
as 6:2016cv00003
Defendant:
Officer A. Alford, Jason Bell, Officer Bunn and others
Plaintiff:
Appleton Pickett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heimke v. Mr. Martinez
as 5:2014cv01077
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Alonzo D. Heimke
Respondent:
Mr. Martinez and William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez-De Aza vs BOP, RCDC #3, Mr. Martinez
as 4:2014cv00048
Defendant:
BOP, RCDC #3, Mr. Martinez
Plaintiff:
Jose Vicente Hernandez-De Aza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez-De Aza v. BOP, RCDC #3, Mr. Martinez
as 7:2014cv00211
Plaintiff:
Jose Vicente Hernandez-De Aza
Defendant:
BOP, RCDC #3, Mr. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gibbons v. Commissioner Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2014cv00709
Defendant:
Aging and People with Disabilities, MD Richard Alley, Amy Beyer and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Roy Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hernandez-De Aza v. BOP, RCDC #3, Mr. Martinez
as 7:2013mc01794
Defendant:
BOP, RCDC #3, Mr. Martinez
Plaintiff:
Jose Vicente Hernandez-De Aza
Lynn v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv04735
Plaintiff:
Sean Carey Lynn
Defendant:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID, Mr. Summers, Ms. Angie Ricks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
