Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Royal Pollard v. Mr. Reynold
as 16-6318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROYAL POLLARD
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. REYNOLDS, Major/Supervisor, MR. SAPP, R.R.J. Officer, LARON DELOATCH, R.R.J. Officer and others
Pollard v. Reynolds et al
as 2:2016cv00034
Plaintiff:
Royal Pollard
Defendant:
Mr. Reynolds, Mr. Sapp, Mr. LaRon Deloatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Toldman et al
as 6:2013cv01874
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
Mr Toldman, T Robertson, R Root and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Blake v. Edwards et al
as 4:2013cv01498
Plaintiff:
Markey Blake
Defendant:
Alex Edwards, Capt Wineglass and Mr Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Knight v. Wilkinson et al
as 7:2012cv00463
Respondent:
Mr. Brown, Mr. Donnie Carter, Ms. Tracey E. Paner and others
Petitioner:
Wilmer Jerome Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McLean v. Ratliff et al
as 7:2012cv00227
Defendant:
Mr. Adams, Mr. Brown, Mr. Kiser and others
Plaintiff:
Quentin McLean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Hicks et al
as 2:2011cv00484
Plaintiff:
Sidney P. Martin
Defendant:
Lt. Hicks and Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gholson et al v. The Commonwealth Of Virginia et al
as 2:2010cv00023
Plaintiff:
Lonnie M. Gholson, The Commonwealth Of Virginia, Mark R. Davis and others
Defendant:
The Commonwealth Of Virginia, Mark Davis, Janet Reno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Aqua America Inc., Aqua Virginia, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00687
Plaintiff:
Sallijo Freeman
Defendant:
Aqua America Inc., Aqua Virginia, Inc., Alpha Water Corporation, Aqua S/L, Inc., Aqua Utility-Virginia, Inc. (Lake Shawnee) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
