Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Robinson v. Well et al
as 2:2023cv01391
Plaintiff:
Harry Robinson
Defendant:
Warden Well, Sgt Lipski, Ms G and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaCroix v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Defendant:
DeAngelo Dove, Christopher Erwing, Brandon French and others
Plaintiff:
Terry LaCroix and Terry Lynn LaCroix
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayweather-Brown - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. English et al
as 3:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Quintin Jamar Mayweathers-Brown and Quintin J Mayweather-Brown
Defendant:
Jayson English, Robert Carter, Jr, John Galipeau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castile v. Hulkman et al
as 1:2021cv02222
Defendant:
. Hulkman, Ms. G., . Morlbaro and others
Plaintiff:
Yaphet Castile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castile v. Hulkman et al
as 3:2021cv50177
Defendant:
Morlbaro, Ms. G. and Hulkman
Plaintiff:
Yaphet Castile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castile v. Hulkman et al
as 1:2021cv01039
Defendant:
. Hulkman, Ms. G. and . Morlbaro
Plaintiff:
Yaphet Castile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castile v. Hulkman et al
as 3:2021cv00094
Defendant:
Ms. G., Dr. Hulkman and Nurse Morlbaro
Plaintiff:
Yaphet Castile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2014cv05511
Plaintiff:
Ned James
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, Thomas Dart, Daniel Moreci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cook County, Illinois et al
as 1:2013cv07273
Plaintiff:
Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
Cook County, Illinois, Toni Preckwinkle, Thomas Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radcliffe v. Reyes et al
as 1:2010cv08214
Plaintiff:
William Radcliffe
Defendant:
Supt. Reyes, C.C.D.O.C., Tom Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
