Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Petteway v. Connecticut Department of Corrections
as 23-8047
Plaintiff:
TAVERAS, Garner CI, CHRISTOPHER DEVEAU, ISAIAH BONEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER Q. PETTEWAY
Defendant / Appellee:
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Which includes, but may not be limited to The Conn State Department Public Health; Securs TECH. Inc; Unity Products, LLC; The United States Post Office Post Master Gomaps, CRAIG WASHINGTON, Warden, Individual and Official Capacity, ANGEL QUIROS, Commissioner of Corrections, Individual and Official Capacity and others
William Gregory, Jr. v. L. Levin
as 17-7455
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM JAMES GREGORY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. L. LEVIN, Dr. Doctor Haynesville Corr. Ctr.
Defendant:
CHARLES ALLEN, Warden, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, DAVID ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00007
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361
Clarence Roulhac, Jr. v. B. Janek
as 13-6756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE ROULHAC, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
B. S. JANEK, DMD, Dentist, Powhatan Correctional Center
Defendant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, LINDA RAY, Ms., Head Nurse, Powhatan Correctional Center, L. KUMP, Ms., Doctor, Powhatan Correctional Center and others
Clarence Roulhac, Jr. v. B. Janek
as 12-7908
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE ROULHAC, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
B. S. JANEK, DMD, Dentist, Powhatan Correctional Center
Defendant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, LINDA RAY, Ms., Head Nurse, Powhatan Correctional Center, L. KUMP, Ms., Doctor, Powhatan Correctional Center and others
Clarence Roulhac, Jr. v. B. Janek
as 12-6528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE ROULHAC, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
B. S. JANEK, DMD, Dentist, Powhatan Correctional Center, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, LINDA RAY, Ms., Head Nurse, Powhatan Correctional Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
