Cases 11 - 20 of 45
David Meyers v. A. Robinson
as 21-6688
Defendant / Appellee:
WAUMMADI, MICHELLE WALKER, Counselor, A. BROWN, Intel Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Director of Action Alliance Commonwealth of VAPREA
as 21-6672
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER BROWN, SXI Intel Officer, PEODE, SX1 Physician, MAJOR RUFFIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-6674
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN IVAN GILMORE, Chief Warden, COUNSELOR R. BRITT, ANGELA WETHINGTON, Operations Manager/PREA Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Warden I. Hamilton
as 21-6660
Defendant / Appellee:
TONYA FOREMAN, DR. ULEP, TINYA FOREMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Meyers v. Perry et al
as 2:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Ofc. Cornelius Bland, Officer Mr. Lockhart, Ofc. Ms. Bernard and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Robinson et al
as 2:2020cv00523
Defendant:
Sgt. Ms. Dial, A. David Robinson, Daniel McGowan and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00469
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERKINS v. PRIMUS et al
as 3:2020cv00064
Defendant:
Antonio Caldwell, MESSER, Officer Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Sherwin Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Gilmore et al
as 2:2020cv00444
Defendant:
Ofc. Cornelius Bland, Joseph Walters, QMHP - Ms. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosier v. Georgia Department of Correctional Healthcare/Augusta University Hospital et al
as 4:2020cv00020
Defendant:
Global Economic Opportunities Group, Inc, Pamala Malcolm, Georgia Department of Correctional Healthcare/Augusta University Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Mosier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
