Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Amos Hicks v. Donald Ames
as 21-7526
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMOS GABRIEL HICKS
Respondent / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT DONALD F. AMES, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex
Slonaker v. Jividin et al
as 2:2021cv00036
Defendant:
Betsy Jividin, West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Donald Ames and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel F. Slonaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Mt. Olive Correctional Complex et al
as 2:2020cv00725
Defendant:
Dr. Lyle, Officer Smith, Officer Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar J. Chapman, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Michael v. CO II Dave Gordon
as 20-6445
Defendant / Appellee:
CO II DAVE GORDON, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex, DR. GARCIA, Wexford Health Services, Stevens Correctional Center, DR. LYE, Wexford Health Services (MOCC) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LOGAN MICHAEL
White v. W.Va. Division of Correction et al
as 3:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
Aaron L. White
Defendant:
W.Va. Division of Correction and Mt. Olive Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Mt. Olive Correctional Complex et al
as 2:2018cv00093
Plaintiff:
Phillip G. Johnson
Defendant:
Mt. Olive Correctional Complex and Benjamin Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Brown v. David Ballard
as 17-6837
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, in his capacity as Warden, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex
Harding v. Rubenstein et al
as 1:2016cv00173
Plaintiff:
Smitty Harding
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Karen Pszczolkowski, Cecelia Janiszewski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donell Lee v. David Ballard
as 15-7963
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONELL D. LEE
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex
Warren Hester, II v. David Ballard
as 15-7605
Petitioner - Appellant:
WARREN CUTHA HESTER, II
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
