Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Moon v. Louisville Metro Corrections Medical Staff
as 3:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Darinaija Moon and Duwan Mudd
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Corrections Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moon v. Louisville Metro Corrections
as 3:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Darinaija Moon and Dawuan Mudd
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moon v. City of Louisville, KY et al
as 3:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Darinaija Anani Moon and Dawuan Terrell Mudd
Defendant:
City of Louisville, KY, Louisville Metro Corrections, TARC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mudd v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03369
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mudd
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Mudd v. Loudon County et al
as 3:2021cv00402
Plaintiff:
William Mudd
Defendant:
Loudon County, Jake Keener, Deputy Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Devan Pierson v. Grayson County Detention Ctr, et al
as 20-5366
Defendant / Appellee:
M.D. PAUL THOMAS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, [UNKNOWN] OFFICER NO. 2, Officer at Grayson County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVAN LAMONT PIERSON
Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America v. Mudd's Furniture Showrooms, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00186
Defendant:
Mudd's Furniture Showrooms, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rainey v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2019cv00835
Defendant:
Store Employer, Shon Pharr, Detectives and others
Plaintiff:
Rico Rayshon Rainey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
