Cases 1 - 10 of 37
MUHAMMAD v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00273
Petitioner:
RAHMAN MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Graham et al v. Elkhart General Hospital et al
as 3:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
William J Graham, Willie Joe Graham, Dianna Graham and others
Defendant:
James L Shoemaker, Jr, O'Dene Hanniffe Lewis, Muhammad Ahsan Saeed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. Elkhart General Hospital et al
as 3:2023cv00276
Defendant:
O'Dene Hanniffe Lewis, Muhammad Ahsan Saeed, Elkhart General Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Dianna Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Graham v. Elkhart General Hospital et al
as 3:2022cv00946
Plaintiff:
Dianna Graham
Defendant:
Elkhart General Hospital, Elkhart Clinic, Carl Risk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. Gladieux et al
as 1:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Fatir Mu'min Muhammad
Defendant:
David Gladieux, Tim Dettmer and David Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUHAMMAD v. KALLIS
as 2:2022cv00217
Petitioner:
SAIYD A. MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01316
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2020cv00116
Defendant:
AMANDA ADAMS, T.J. WATSON, ISHMAEL OLIVER and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY RAY JACKSON and MUHAMMAD AHMAD AJAJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
