Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Parlon v. The United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2024cv10886
Plaintiff:
Joseph Patrick Parlon
Defendant:
The United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Shoba Sivaprassad Wadhia and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Riley v. Women's Lunch Place et al
as 1:2023cv12463
Plaintiff:
Penelope Riley
Defendant:
Women's Lunch Place, Boston Housing Authority, Woods Mullen Shelter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Mullen v. Kissell, et al
as 23-1452
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTHA MULLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD J. KISSELL, JR. and BEDFORD HIGH SCHOOL
Mullen v. Kissell, et al
as 23-1264
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTHA MULLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD J. KISSELL, JR. and BEDFORD HIGH SCHOOL
Mullen v. Kissell et al
as 1:2022cv00575
Plaintiff:
Martha Mullen
Defendant:
Edward J. Kissell, Jr., Unidentified Bedford High School Employee and Bedford High School Voting Site
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MULLEN v. Department of Corrections of Massachusetts et al
as 4:2021cv40116
Plaintiff:
Jason Mullen
Defendant:
Department of Corrections of Massachusetts, Christopher Phillips, James Gearin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIDEON ASEN LLC v. GLESSNER et al
as 2:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
GIDEON ASEN LLC
Defendant:
JAMES T GLESSNER and HON ROBERT E MULLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullen v. Atrium Medical Corporation, et al.
as 1:2021cv00429
Plaintiff:
Ruth Mullen
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
