Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
MULVERHILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv84562
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MULVERHILL
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sawyer v. Prack
as 18-2073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Trazz Sawyer
Defendant - Appellee:
D. Richards, Correctional Officer and S. Langdon, Correctional Officer
Defendant:
Albert Prack, Director of Special Housing/Inmate Discipline Program of DOCCS, D. Phelix, Deputy Superintendent of Security; Bare Hill Correctional Facility, Mulverhill, Nurse; Bare Hill Correctional Facility and others
Mulverhill v. USA
as 6:2017cv03324
Respondent:
USA
Movant:
Charles Kenneth Mulverhill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Campos v. Yelich
as 16-4194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John S. Campos
Defendant - Appellee:
Bruce S. Yelich, Superintendent; Bare Hill Correctional Facility, J. Hellijas, Sergeant; Bare Hill Correctional Facility, Eddir M. Felliin, Hearing Officer; Bare Hill Correctional Facility and others
United States v. Charles Mulverhill
as 15-3241
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Charles Kenneth Mulverhill
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sawyer v. Prack et al
as 9:2014cv01198
Plaintiff:
Trazz Sawyer
Defendant:
Albert Prack, D. Phelix, D. Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Connolly
as 14-288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Johnathan Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
B. Connolly, Doctor, John Alves, Doctor, Miles, Nurse and others
Johnson v. Connolly
as 13-4038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Johnathan Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
B. Connolly, Doctor, John Alves, Doctor, Miles, Nurse and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
