Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Muskegon, County of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv01155
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Muskegon, County of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Muskegon County Sheriff's Department v. Harbor Guard Boats, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01074
Plaintiff:
Muskegon County Sheriff's Department
Defendant:
Harbor Guard Boats, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Anderson #180023 v. Muskegon Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv00756
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Anderson #180023
Defendant:
Muskegon Police Department, Brett Gardner, Les Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kruse v. Stamour et al
as 1:2017cv00724
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Kruse
Defendant:
Sam E. Stamour, Jacob J. Ashker, Kevin B. Even and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimm v. Raw Story Media, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00654
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Grimm
Defendant:
Raw Story Media, Inc., The Herald Publishing Company, LLC, MLive Media Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Norton Shores, City of et al
as 1:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Roberts
Defendant:
Norton Shores, City of, Norton Shores Police Department, James Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01307
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. Muskegon County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2016cv01118
Plaintiff:
Bobby Derrick Gamble
Defendant:
Muskegon County Sheriff's Department, Dean Roseler, Mark Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
