Cases 1 - 9 of 9
KELLY v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KELLY
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, KAY WILKS, M.D., CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wharton v. St Joesph County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv00861
Plaintiff:
Peter Allen Wharton
Defendant:
St Joesph County Jail, St Joesph County Jail Dentist, N.P./Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOICOURT v. JOHNSON
as 1:2021cv01847
Defendant:
N.P. JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
DENNIS R. BOICOURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROAR v. PETTY et al
as 2:2020cv00397
Defendant:
C. WILLAMS, N.P. PETTY, I. RANDOLPH and others
Plaintiff:
JASON ROAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2015cv01532
Defendant:
NURSE J. BIGHEART, DEANGELA BOYAN, OFC. D. BROWN and others
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE A. ROBINSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANCLEAVE v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2013cv01586
Defendant:
ARAMARK, BARNES, ROBERT BURNS and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL K. VANCLEAVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDS v. MITCHEFF et al
as 1:2010cv01583
Defendant:
MS. JANE DOE, N.P., MS. GONZALES, N.P., DR. HIRSCHLER, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY R. RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SERRANO et al v. SHOOT et al
as 1:2010cv00705
Defendant:
CAROLYN BICKEL, R.N., ROBERT S. CRAIG, Psych, C. HERBERT HENRY, PH.D and others
Plaintiff:
DIANA SERRANO and DIANA SERRANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ESTATE OF JOSE ALFREDO PEREZ LEON et al v. THE CITY OF SEYMOUR et al
as 1:2008cv00614
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JOSE ALFREDO PEREZ LEON, ESTATE OF JOSE ALFREDO PEREZ LEON, HEATHER HERN and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF SEYMOUR, OFFICER BART BEAVERS and OFFICER MIKE HENLEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
