Cases 21 - 30 of 15,260
Romero v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv05793
Plaintiff:
Janice Annita Romero
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SCHWARTZ v. BURWELL et al
as 2:2020cv05539
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATTHEWS BURWELL and NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
DENNIS JAMES SCHWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Morris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv05171
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Shaterese Latalia Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sprouse v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01242
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Sprouse
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2051
QUINN v. BURWELL et al
as 2:2020cv04520
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATTHEWS BURWELL and NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
LISA MARIE QUINN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith-Joseph v. Berryhill
as 1:2020cv02494
Plaintiff:
Laquanda Smith-Joseph
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Yakina M. Spearman v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2020cv06893
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Yakina M. Spearman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Duke v. Berryhill
as 1:2020cv00831
Plaintiff:
Laurie A. Miller Duke
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2051
McLemore v. Berryhill
as 3:2020cv00882
Plaintiff:
Wanda Melanie McLemore
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bryan Perez v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2020cv06236
Plaintiff:
Bryan Perez
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
