Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Annan-Yartey v. State of Hawaii Department of Transportation Airport et al
as 1:2018cv00107
Plaintiff:
Napoleon T. Annan-Yartey, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Hawaii Department of Transportation Airport, Securitas Security Service USA, Inc., John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Napoleon Annan-Yartey v. T. Muranaka, et al
as 17-15689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NAPOLEON T. ANNAN-YARTEY
Defendant - Appellee:
T. MURANAKA, HPD Officer, ROYCE S. OHIRA, HPD Officer, LOUIS M. KEALOHA, sued in his official capacity as the Chief of the Honolulu Police Department and others
Napoleon T. Annan-Yartey. Sr. v. T. Muranaka, et al.
as 1:2016cv00590
Plaintiff:
Napoleon T. Annan-Yartey, Sr.
Defendant:
T. Muranaka, Royce S. Ohira, Chad K. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Annan-Yartey v. DTRIC Insurance Company, Limited et al
as 1:2013cv00391
Plaintiff:
Napoleon T. Annan-Yartey
Defendant:
DTRIC Insurance Company, Limited and Juvita Fong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Napoleon T. Annan Yartey v. Montgomery Board of Education
as 10-2441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NAPOLEON T. ANNAN YARTEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTGOMERY BOARD OF EDUCATION, The President, PATRICIA O'NEILL, CHRISTOPHER S. BARCLAY and others
Yartey v. Montgomery Board of Education et al
as 8:2010cv01384
Plaintiff:
Napoleon T. Annan Yartey
Defendant:
Montgomery Board of Education , Patricia O'Niell , Christopher S. Barclay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YARTEY v. MONTGOMERY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2010cv00523
Plaintiff:
NAPOLEON T. ANNAN YARTEY
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY BOARD OF EDUCATION, PATRICIA O'NIELL, CHRISTOPHER S. BARCLAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Napoleon Annan-Yartey v. Honolulu Police Department, et al
as 08-16221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NAPOLEON T. ANNAN-YARTEY
Defendant - Appellee:
HONOLULU POLICE DEPARTMENT, PIGRRE SHAWN, Officer, CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, Municipal Corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
