Cases 1 - 10 of 287
Brulport v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2023cv03320
Plaintiff:
BARBARA JEAN BRULPORT and Barbara Jean Brulport, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Steven Bruce Brulport, Deceased
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Aerco International, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Buffalo Pumps Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Christensen et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2023cv05255
Defendant:
3M Company, Cleaver-Brooks, Inc., Crane Environmental, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
David Emmett Christensen, Linda G. Christensen and Linda G Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Dennis Rockwell, et al v. ASCO, L.P., et al
as 22-56198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS A. ROCKWELL and DAWN ROCKWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ASCO, L.P., Successor-in-interest to Foster Engineering, FKA ASCO Valve, Inc., FKA ASCO Valve, LLC, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC, CRANE CO., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Wohlfert v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv05040
Plaintiff:
Wayne Wohlfert
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, A.O. Smith Corporation, ABB, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
JOHN FYNES, ET AL v. BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., et al
as 2:2022cv03398
Plaintiff:
JOHN FYNES and MARYANN FYNES
Defendant:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., Bayer Cropscience, INc. (f/k/a Aventis CropScience USA Inc., f/k/a Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company Inc., a/k/a Amchem Products, Inc.) unknown Aventis Cropscience USA Inc. unknown Am, CBS CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, F/K/A VIACOM, INC., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO CBS CORPORATION, A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, F/K/A WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, GOULDS PUMPS, INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
BRAND INSULATIONS, INC., CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.,, CONWED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
DOUGHERTY et al v. A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv03204
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD DOUGHERTY, MICHELE A DOUGHERTY and JAMES EDWARD DOUGHERTY, III
Defendant:
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY, ABB, INC., ALFA LAVAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Bierwirth v. AII Acquisition Corporation, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00509
Defendant:
Alan MRO Supply Inc., Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. doing business as Weir Valves & Controls USA, Inc. formerly known as Statewide Industrial Equipment Co., Inc., Individually and as Successor by Merger to Sager-Spuck Supply Co., Inc., BW/IP International Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Bierwirth and Gloria Bierwirth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Scott v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 3:2022cv00613
Defendant:
Cameron International Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation, Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Chauvin v. ABB, Inc., et al
as 2:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Chauvin
Defendant:
ABB, Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Bailey Controls and ITE Imperial Company f/k/a ITE Circuit Breaker Company, AK Steel Corporation, as successor-in-interest to National Supply, Albert L. Bossier, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Horton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al.
as 3:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
JULIA, Individually and as Special Administrator o HORTON and Julia Horton
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Successor-by-Merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., ALFA LAVAL INC., as Successor-in-Interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY, AR WILFLEY AND SONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
