Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Amin v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC.
as 5:2023mc00002
Plaintiff: M.D. Mahendra Amin
Petitioner: Azadeh Shahshahani
Defendant: NBCUniversal Media, LLC
Amicus Curiae: The National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild, Immigrant Rights Clinic at Morningside Heights Legal Service, Inc., Sabrineh Ardalan and others
Amin v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC.
as 1:2023cv04492
Plaintiff: Dr. Mahendra Amin
Defendant: NBCUniversal Media, LLC.
Amicus Curiae: The National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild, Immigrant Rights Clinic at Morningside Heights Legal Service, Inc., Sabrineh Ardalan and others
Petitioner: Azadeh Shahshahani
Amin v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC.
as 1:2023mi00095
Plaintiff: Dr. Mahendra Amin
Defendant: NBCUniversal Media, LLC.
Amicus Curiae: The National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild, Immigrant Rights Clinic at Morningside Heights Legal Service, Inc., Sabrineh Ardalan and others
Petitioner: Azadeh Shahshahani
NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2022cv03634
Plaintiff: NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF STATE and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
as 1:2022cv03632
Plaintiff: NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON et al v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
as 1:2020cv03120
Plaintiff: NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD, PROJECT SOUTH and CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON
Defendant: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD et al v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION REVIEW et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00852
Plaintiff: NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD, ENRIQUE NAPOLES VAILLANT, ARLETY ALIAGA-COBAS and others
Defendant: IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, JAMES MCHENRY, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION REVIEW and others
Amicus Curiae: FORMER FEDERAL IMMIGRATION JUDGES, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF IMMIGRATION JUDGES, FORMER IMMIGRATION JUDGES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Ravidath Ragbir v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1282
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAVIDATH RAGBIR
Undetermined: IMMIGRANT DEFENSE PROJECT and NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD
Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al.,
as 3:2018cv03359
Plaintiff: Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto and National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Ragbir v. Homan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-1597
Plaintiff - Appellant: Ravidath Lawrence Ragbir, New Sanctuary Coalition of New York City, CASA de Maryland, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee: Thomas D. Homan, in his official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the duties of the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Scott Mechkowski, in his official capacity as Assistant New York Field Office Directorfor U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?