Cases 1 - 7 of 7
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, VALUE DRUG COMPANY, BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 345 HEALTH CARE FUND, WALGREEN CO., KROGER COMPANY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ASTRAZENECA AB, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE and others
Interested Party:
CAREMARKPCS HEALTH, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Intervenor:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC., AMERICAN ANTITRUST INSTITUTE and others
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 14-1522
Defendant / Appellant:
RANBAXY INC., RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SUPERVALU, INC., MEIJER, INC., KROGER COMPANY and others
Interested Party:
JONATHAN RICH, EDWARD BREIVIK, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 595 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ANTITRUST INSTITUTE, US PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE ASSOCIATION FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES and others
Intervenor:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 14-1521
Defendant / Appellant:
RANBAXY INC., RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SUPERVALU, INC., MEIJER, INC., KROGER COMPANY and others
Interested Party:
JONATHAN RICH, EDWARD BREIVIK, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 595 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ANTITRUST INSTITUTE, US PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE ASSOCIATION FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES and others
Intervenor:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHAIN DRUG STORES et al v. EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv00395
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHAIN DRUG STORES , NATIONAL COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION , KLINGENSMITH DRUG INC. and others
Defendant:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.
Amicu:
CONSUMER FEDERATION OF AMERICA , NATIONAL CONSUMERS LEAGUE , NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE ASSOCIATION ON PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
NOVO NORDISK V CARACO PHARMA
as 10-1001
Amicus Curiae:
Apotex Inc., Consumer Federation of America, Generic Pharmaceutical Association and others
Defendant-Appellee:
Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk, Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S and others
Novo Nordisk, Inc:
, , and others
IMS HEALTH INCORPORATED et al v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, MAINE
as 1:2007cv00127
Plaintiff:
IMS HEALTH INCORPORATED , VERISPAN LLC and SOURCE HEALTHCARE ANALYTICS INC
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, MAINE
Amicu:
AARP , COMMUNITY CATALYST , NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE ASSOCIATION ON PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
BIOTECH IND V DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 06-1593
Amicus Curiae:
AFSCME DC 37 Health & Security Plan, Action Alliance of Senior Citizens of Greater Philadelphia, Alliance for Retired Americans and others
Defendant-Appellant:
Adrian M. Fenty, Mayor of the District of Columbia, Anthony A. Williams, Mayor of the District of Columbia, Arnold R. Finlayson, Administrator, Office Documents & Admin Issuances and others
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Biotechnology Industry Organization and Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
