Cases 1 - 10 of 14
LUNSFORD v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2022cv00910
Plaintiff:
JAMEL TYREE LUNSFORD
Defendant:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, STATE OF NC and NC DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burr v. Macon County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2016cv00401
Plaintiff:
Joshua L. Burr
Defendant:
Macon County Sheriff's Office, NC DOC, Kristopher Prince and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN DYKE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2015cv00312
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
THOMAS DAVIS, ROBERT JAMES DAVIS, PIEDMONT CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. FEDERAL GOV DOC ETC et al
as 1:2015cv00203
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
FEDERAL GOV DOC ETC, STATE OF NC DOC, G. BILYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. NC DOC
as 5:2012ct03143
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Gardner, IV
Defendant:
NC DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Rankins v. Donnie Stanley
as 10-6211
Appellant:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JOHN URBANIAK, JR., EDWARD ALLEN, SHAWN DERRICK BONNETT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DONNIE STANLEY, Sgt., JOHN MEEKS, Capt., THOMAS TART, Lt. and others
Garcel Christian v. Theodis Beck
as 09-7984
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARCEL LAVAR CHRISTIAN
Respondent - Appellee:
THEODIS BECK, Secretary of NC DOC and LANDAR CORPENING, Superintendent of Foothills CI
Michael McNeill v. Officer Ashley
as 09-7602
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCNEILL
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER ASHLEY, NC DOC DIRECTOR and CAPTAIN MESSENBURG
Michael McNeill v. Frank Stamper
as 09-6264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCNEILL
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK STAMPER
Defendant - None:
SERGEANT KINNEY, ATLANTIC DIAGNOSTIC OF DURHAM and NC DOC DIRECTOR
Michael McNeill v. Atlantic Diagnostic of Durham
as 08-7942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCNEILL
Defendant - Appellee:
ATLANTIC DIAGNOSTIC OF DURHAM, SERGEANT KINNEY and NC DOC DIRECTOR
Defendant - None:
FRANK STAMPER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
