Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00773
Defendant:
Christopher Ellis, NCB Management Services, Inc. and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00774
Defendant:
Christopher Ellis, NCB Management Services, Inc. and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
MEDINA v. NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2023cv01270
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO MEDINA
Defendant:
NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2721 Federal Drivers Privacy Protection Act
Johnson v. NCB Management Services Inc
as 4:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Robin Johnson
Defendant:
NCB Management Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Welch v. NCB Management Services Inc.
as 1:2022cv00400
Plaintiff:
Jessica Welch
Defendant:
NCB Management Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Carbary v. NCB Management Services, Inc.
as 2:2022cv10194
Plaintiff:
Tracy Carbary
Defendant:
NCB Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Matthew McClain v. Fortis Capital II, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv01137
Plaintiff:
Matthew McClain
Defendant:
Fortis Capital II, LLC, NCB Management Services, Inc., ROES 1 through 75, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sejdic v. NCB Management Services, Inc.
as 6:2020cv06142
Defendant:
NCB Management Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
ALMEDIN SEJDIC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Vigoureux v. Capital Management Services, LP et al
as 8:2020cv00277
Plaintiff:
Alexander Vigoureux
Defendant:
NCB Management Services, Inc. and Capital Management Services, LP
Not Classified By Court:
Peter J. Grilli
Rowley v. Does 1-25
as 1:2019cv02305
Defendant:
NCB Management Services, Inc. and John Does 1-25
Plaintiff:
John Rowley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
