Cases 21 - 30 of 1,356
WHITING v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2023cv02450
Plaintiff:
DAVID NEAL WHITING
Defendant:
County of Orange, Orange County Sheriff Department, SHERIFF DON BARNES, in his individual and official capacities and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Susan Ann Smith v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2023cv02426
Plaintiff:
Susan Ann Smith
Defendant:
County of Orange, Orange County Sheriffs Department, Sheriff Don Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Marsden v. Graham, et al.
as 4:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ray Marsden
Defendant:
Zebulon Graham and Randall Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henreid v. Haynes
as 2:2023at01228
Plaintiff:
Paul Henreid
Defendant:
Raymond Neal Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assualt,Slander
Henreid v. Haynes
as 2:2023cv02797
Plaintiff:
Paul Henreid
Defendant:
Raymond Neal Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assualt,Slander
Choi v. JTB America, Ltd., et al.
as 1:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Hye Ja Choi
Defendant:
JTB America, Ltd., JTB Hawaii Inc., Tachibana Enterprises LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Neal v. Dulgov
as 4:2023cv00507
Petitioner:
Seneca Loyal Neal
Respondent:
A Dulgov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
