Cases 1 - 10 of 275
Eckerd v. Jump
as 2:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Andrew William Eckerd
Respondent:
E. Neal Jump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hasuan v. Ferra et al
as 2:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Asaad Amir Hasuan
Defendant:
George Ferra, Glynn County Detention Center and Sheriff E. Neal Jump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hasuan v. Ferra et al
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Asaad Amir Hasuan
Defendant:
Major George Ferra, Sheriff E. Neal Jump and Glynn County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westberry v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Troy Westberry
Defendant:
Cert Smith, Private Contractor, Clue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckerd v. Jump et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Sheriff E. Neal Jump, Rebecca J. Walden, Roger B. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Sage Software LLC
as 1:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Christian Neal
Defendant:
Sage Software LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Libel, Assault, Slander
Henry et al v. Neal et al
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Aja N. Henry and James A. Henry
Defendant:
Joyce Neal, DeKalb County Corp., Marshal Sgt. L. Huang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Steven James Gomez Jr. v. D. Richardson
as 1:2023cv04892
Plaintiff:
Steven James Gomez Jr.
Defendant:
Officer D. Richardson, Judge Jennifer Neal-Jones, Christopher Kehell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
