Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MATTHEWS v. MYLAN LABORATORIES, LTD. et al
as 1:2021cv10282
Defendant:
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MYLAN LABORATORIES, LTD., RITE AID CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
NEAL MATTHEWS and NEAL E MATTHEWS
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLACKBURN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv13567
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NEAL MATTHEW BLACKBURN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Trevor Matthew
as 16-10776
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TREVOR NEAL MATTHEW, Custody
Norton v. Greene County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2011cv00157
Plaintiff:
Valerie Norton
Defendant:
Greene County, Tennessee, Greene County Commission, Steven Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner v. Burns et al
as 2:2009cv00091
Plaintiff:
Chad Warner
Defendant:
Steve Burns and Neal Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Burns et al
as 2:2009cv00084
Plaintiff:
James W Black, III
Defendant:
Steve Burns, Neal Matthews and Susan Cristen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Burns et al
as 2:2009cv00078
Plaintiff:
Michael J Morris
Defendant:
Steve Burns, Neal Matthews and Susan Christen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitson v. Burns et al
as 2:2007cv00125
Plaintiff:
Weston L Whitson
Defendant:
Steve Burns, Neal Matthews and Greene County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Burns et al
as 2:2007cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W Holmes
Defendant:
Steve Burns and Neal Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roach v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 2:2007cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Dewayne Roach
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service, Jeffrey Hedden, Steve Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
