Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bland v. Swanson Services Corporation, et al
as 6:2023cv02466
Plaintiff:
Ned Gerome Bland, Jr.
Defendant:
Swanson Services Corporation, Rick Wells and Trinity Services Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. BEASLEY
as 7:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
ROY MANDELL SMITH
Defendant:
Lt AARON KIRK, Supervisor KEVIN CONNOLLY, NED M MIKULA and others
Respondent:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hanner v. State of Florida
as 8:2018cv00961
Petitioner:
Ned Hanner
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMPSON v. JONES
as 1:2015cv00109
Petitioner:
NED CARMER THOMPSON
Respondent:
JULIE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
St. Fleur v. Walrath et al
as 1:2013cv01794
Petitioner:
Ned St. Fleur
Respondent:
Barbara Walrath and Eric Holder
Hanner v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2012cv01599
Petitioner:
Ned Hanner
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cherry v. Circuit Court of Madison, The et al
as 5:2012cv00387
Plaintiff:
Danny William Cherry
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Madison, The, Karen Hall, D E O'Dell and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardin v. City of Troy Public Work Dept et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv00663
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hardin
Defendant:
City of Troy Public Work Dept, Mr. May, Mr. Von and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Layton v. Trinity Food Services et al
as 4:2008cv10075
Plaintiff:
Ned Jeffery Layton
Defendant:
Trinity Food Services and Monroe County Jail Medical Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Erickson v. Jeter et al
as 6:2008cv01695
Plaintiff:
Erick James Erickson
Defendant:
Susan Jeter, Ned Mills, Jason Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
