Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01354
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. Martinez-De Leon
as 25-50859
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nestor Martinez-De Leon
In re: Luis Martinez
as 22-2625
Petitioner:
In re: LUIS NESTOR MARTINEZ
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
MARTINEZ v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2022cv03292
Petitioner:
LUIS NESTOR MARTINEZ
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOSH SHAPIRO and SCOTT KLINEFELTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luis Nestor MartinezIn re: Luis Nestor Martinez
as 22-1053
Petitioner:
In re: LUIS NESTOR MARTINEZ
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
MARTINEZ v. SMTIH et al
as 5:2021cv05533
Petitioner:
LUIS NESTOR MARTINEZ
Respondent:
BARRY SMTIH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bruzos v. US
as 21-1195
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN HITE, DAVID SHARP, SANDIARTA KURNIAWAN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Luis MartinezIn re: Luis Martinez
as 19-3958
Not Yet Classified:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, In re: LUIS NESTOR MARTINEZ and BARRY SMITH, Fac. Mngr. Houtz
MARTINEZ v. SMITH
as 5:2019cv05018
Plaintiff:
LUIS NESTOR MARTINEZ
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez v. Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., et al
as 1:2019cv00118
Defendant:
Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a Aeromexico, Aerolitoral S.A. de C.V. d/b/a Aeromexico Connect, Aerolitoral S.A. De C.V. and others
Plaintiff:
Nestor Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
