Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Emil Jutrowski v. Township of Riverdale, et al
as 17-2594
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMIL JUTROWSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF RIVERDALE, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, by and Through the New Jersey State Police, JEFFREY HEIMBACH, New Jersey State Police Trooper, Individually and in his reperesentative capacity as a State Police Officer and others
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER BIRO, individually and in his representative capacity as a sergeant employed by the Riverdale Police Department, CHIEF THOMAS SOULES, in his representative capacity as Chief of the Riverdale Police Department and TRAVIS ROEMMELE, individually and in his representative capacity as a Riverdale Police Officer
TORRES v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 3:2015cv04080
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TORRES
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, MIGUEL GUARDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee et al v. Schneiderman et al
as 1:2015cv00548
Plaintiff:
Janice H. Lee , Bon Hyub Koo , Ryan Jun-Mo Koo and others
Defendant:
Eric T. Schneiderman, Kelly Donovan, Peri Alyse Kadanoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen Morris v. USA, et al
as 13-1658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN D. MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through, UNITED STATES MARSHALL SERVICE FUGITIVE TASK FORCE, DOMINICK FERRARI, City of Vineland and others
ROUDABUSH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2011cv00980
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRIS CHRISTIE, LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv00294
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRIS CHRISTIE, LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOUGHTY v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE OFFICER R. COMUNALE
as 1:2008cv02012
Plaintiff:
EDWARD DOUGHTY
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE OFFICER R. COMUNALE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
