Cases 21 - 30 of 44
KIRKLAND BEY v. PENNSAUKEN MUNICIPAL COURT et al
as 1:2017cv09019
Plaintiff:
ATIYA KIRKLAND BEY
Defendant:
PENNSAUKEN MUNICIPAL COURT, STEVEN M. PETRILLO, DONNA M. KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEBB v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT
as 1:2017cv02691
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. WEBB
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Hatch v. New Jersey Superior Court, et al
as 17-1338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE E. HATCH
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3538
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ROGERS v. SATAN GOD et al
as 2:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROGERS
Defendant:
SATAN GOD, BARAK OBAMA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DUNBAR v. WOODS et al
as 3:2015cv06982
Plaintiff:
EARL DUNBAR, II
Defendant:
KIMBERLY WOODS and NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT, FAMILY DIVISION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WEBER v. NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT
as 2:2015cv06042
Petitioner:
AMY WEBER
Respondent:
NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT, BERGEN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
WILLIAMS v. NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT HUDSON COUNTY
as 2:2014cv05582
Petitioner:
ANGELO WILLIAMS
Respondent:
NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT HUDSON COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COPELAND-BEY v. NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2014cv04262
Plaintiff:
AMIR COPELAND-BEY
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and RYAN T. STEC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agarwal et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv01873
Plaintiff:
Anil Agarwal and Madhu Agarwal
Defendant:
United States of America, US Congress, All Federal Courts Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
