Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt v. Internal Revenue Services et al
as 2:2024cv01775
Defendant: Gary Sinise, Internal Revenue Services, California Victim Compensation Board and others
Plaintiff: Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
City of Albuquerque, New Mexico et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as 3:2023cv03318
Plaintiff: City of Albuquerque, New Mexico and City of Santa Fe, New Mexico
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Unicolors, Inc. v. Michelle Mae Boutique et al
as 2:2023cv05178
Plaintiff: Unicolors, Inc.
Defendant: Michelle Mae Boutique, Ashley E. Lacer, Dakota Darling Boutique and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Moonlight Investments Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00489
Plaintiff: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a national banking association
Defendant: Moonlight Investments Inc., a New Mexico corporation (aka Moonlite Investments Inc., a New Mexico corporation), Moonlight Construction Inc., a California corporation (aka Moonlite Construction Inc., a California corporation), Peter Tsianis and others
Interested Party: Wells Fargo & Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv04325
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: Meta Platforms Inc.,, Within Unlimited, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg and others
Interested Party: Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: State of New York, State of Alaska, State of California and others
Not Classified By Court: ByteDance Inc., Valve Corporation, HTC America, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Forte Nexus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
Classic Concepts, Inc. v. Bungalow Five, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv03822
Plaintiff: Classic Concepts, Inc. a New Mexico corporation doing business as Classic Home Decor
Defendant: Bungalow Five, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
State of California et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2022cv02583
Plaintiff: State of California, State of New York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant: United States Postal Service and Louis DeJoy
Intervenor Defendant: Oshkosh Defense, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. Safeguard Metals LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00691
Defendant: Jeffrey Santulan, Safeguard Metals LLC and Jeffrey Hill
Plaintiff: Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Alabama Securities Commission, Arizona Corporation Commission and others
Petitioner: Utah Division of Securities
Board of County Commissioners of the County of Bernalillo, New Mexico et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2021cv09838
Plaintiff: Board of County Commissioners of the County of Bernalillo, New Mexico, Board of County Commissioners of the County of Catron, New Mexico, Board of County Commissioners of the County of Cibola, New Mexico and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation et al v. HD Adjusting & Construction doing business as HD Adjusting & Construction, LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv06071
Plaintiff: Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation and Board of Trustees for the Carpenters Southwest Trusts
Defendant: HD Adjusting & Construction doing business as HD Adjusting & Construction, LLC,, HD Adjusting & Construction, Inc.,, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?