Cases 31 - 40 of 52
NEWELL v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN JAMES NEWELL
Defendant:
ERIC A. HOOKS and N.C. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWELL v. SOLOMAN
as 1:2017cv00254
Petitioner:
JONATHAN JAMES NEWELL
Respondent:
GEORGE SOLOMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGinnis v. Newell Rubbermaid Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00793
Plaintiff:
Johnathin Erin Glenn McGinnis
Defendant:
Newell Rubbermaid Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Huggins v. 3PMC, LLC, et al
as 4:2016cv00264
Plaintiff:
Stacy Lee Huggins
Defendant:
3PMC, LLC , Headbrands USA, LLC , Claudia Newell and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
NEWELL v. USA
as 1:2016cv00907
Petitioner:
JOSHUA CARDELL NEWELL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Newell v. USA
as 1:2016cv00233
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Warren Rosslyn Newell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CARCANO et al v. MCCRORY, et al
as 1:2016cv00236
Plaintiff:
JOAQUIN CARCANO , PAYTON GREY MCGARRY , ANGELA GILMORE and others
Defendant:
PATRICK MCCRORY, ROY A. COOPER, III, UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
NEWELL v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00557
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC , DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF SAXON ASSET SECURITIES TRUST 2004-1 MORTGAGE LOAN ASSET BACKED NOTES AND CERTIFICATES SERIES 2004-1 and AMERICA MORTGAGE ASSOCIATES, L.P.
Plaintiff:
GARY NEWELL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Newell v. Henderson County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Warren R. Newell
Defendant:
Henderson County Sheriffs Office, Henderson County Jail Officials and Henderson County Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
REID v. NESBITT et al
as 1:2014cv01088
Plaintiff:
CALEB D. REID
Defendant:
NESBITT, ANTHONY, NORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
