Cases 1 - 10 of 300
Snider (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv01052
Petitioner:
Matthew D. Snider
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herrera Dimas (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv01094
Petitioner:
Munguia Herrera Dimas
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00890
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00891
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flowers (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv00963
Petitioner:
Kenyatta Flowers
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stroud v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv00932
Petitioner:
Mark Stroud
Defendant:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00816
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00805
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
