Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Julius Larry, IV v. Noah Abrams, et al
as 24-11169
Plaintiff:
JULIUS JAMES LARRY, IV
Defendant:
NOAH ABRAMS, HERBERT HARLEY, JONATHAN COUR and others
Larry v. Abrams et al
as 4:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Julius James Larry, IV
Defendant:
Noah Abrams, Herbert Harley, Jonathan Cour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. United States
as 4:2020cv00125
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith, William T. Moore, Christopher Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Karteau O. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. United States
as 1:2020cv01482
Defendant:
United States, William T. Moore, Christopher Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Karteau O. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Moore et al
as 4:2019cv00243
Defendant:
Judge Christopher L. Ray, Agent Brent Minton, Judge Stan Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Karteau Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Heap et al
as 4:2019cv00061
Defendant:
Judge Michael Karpf, Governor Brian Kemp, Attorney Michael Schiavone and others
Plaintiff:
Jabbar Muhammad Ali Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Williams v. Chatham Counter Narcotics Team et al
as 4:2018cv00174
Defendant:
Judge Michael Karpf, The Federal Bureau of Investigation, Judge Penny Hass Freesemann and others
Plaintiff:
Jabbar M.A. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Karpf et al
as 4:2018cv00121
Plaintiff:
Jabbar Williams and Paulette Smith
Defendant:
Micheal Karpf, Steven Spargar, Ian Heap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ERIE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC v. ABRAMS et al
as 3:2017cv04081
Plaintiff:
ERIE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
Defendant:
NOAH ABRAMS and A-TEAM FILMS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Julius Larry, IV v. Noah Abrams, et al
as 15-14505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIUS JAMES LARRY, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
NOAH ABRAMS, Assistant District Attorney, MEG HEAP, District Attorney, JOHNATHAN COUR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
