Cases 1 - 10 of 100
GUERRA v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 4:2026cv00256
Plaintiff:
NOEL GUERRA, JR
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Seoane v. Trump et al
as 6:2026cv02092
Plaintiff:
Donald Carlos Seoane and Donny Long
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Keith E. Neely, Kash Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Pendleton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv01745
Plaintiff:
Lucas Noel Pendleton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv00537
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fusilier v. Larned State Hospital et al
as 6:2026cv01281
Plaintiff:
Karen M. Fusilier and Karen Fusilier
Defendant:
Larned State Hospital, Robin Karp-Null, Travis Hamrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv06936
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gronus v. Ardolino et al
as 1:2026cv11252
Plaintiff:
Artur Gronus
Defendant:
Michael Ardolino, Noel Acosta, Monterrey Security Consultants, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01970
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
