Cases 1 - 10 of 156
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Robertson et al v. Louisiana Board of Pardons et al
as 3:2023cv01494
Plaintiff:
Allen Robertson, Jr, Anthony Bell, Daniel Joseph Blank and others
Petitioner:
Jason Reeves
Defendant:
Gregory C Brown, Lederrick Campbell, Louisiana Board of Pardons and others
Not Classified By Court:
Shawn Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nolan v. Peralta et al
as 5:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Gary Monroe Nolan
Defendant:
Lisa Peralta and Director of T.C.C.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan v. Peralta
as 5:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Gary Monroe Nolan
Defendant:
Lisa Peralta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Nolan v. Director-TCCO
as 5:2023cv00116
Petitioner:
Gary Monroe Nolan
Respondent:
Director-TCCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nolan v. Peralta et al
as 5:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Gary Monroe Nolan
Defendant:
Lisa Peralta, C. Rangel and James Winkler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nolan v. Batesville Police Dept. et al
as 3:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
William Kelly Nolan
Respondent:
Batesville Police Dept. and Panola Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
