Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Easley v. Nolan et al
as 3:2023cv01756
Plaintiff:
David Easley
Defendant:
Aaron J. Nolan, Robia Jones-Barringer, Lucas County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Meinke et al v. Stammitti et al
as 1:2023cv01175
Plaintiff:
Nolan P. Meinke and Jose Romero
Defendant:
Sheriff Philip R. Stammitti, Captain Hammond Jack, Administrator James Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hairston v. Sparks et al
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Rico Isaih Hairston
Defendant:
Sparks, Theodore Jackson, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huber v. Nolan et al
as 1:2019cv00224
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Huber
Defendant:
Brian Nolan and Linnea Mahlman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bismillah v. Bureau of Medical Services et al
as 3:2018cv02741
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Stuart Hudson, Bureau of Medical Services and others
Plaintiff:
Bismillah and Phillip Douglas Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burfitt v. Erving et al
as 1:2018cv00260
Plaintiff:
Lawrence R. Burfitt, II
Defendant:
M. Erving, M. Esaum, R. Buroughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pullen v. Combs et al
as 1:2017cv00255
Plaintiff:
Terry Tyrone Pullen, Jr
Defendant:
Combs, Shaw, Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ogg v. Clark et al
as 1:2016cv00816
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Ogg
Defendant:
James M Clark, Greg Holdren and Brian Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pullen v. Cool et al
as 1:2016cv00515
Plaintiff:
Terry Tyrone Pullen, Jr
Defendant:
William Cool, Cynthia Davis, David Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 1:2015cv00762
Plaintiff:
David Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Managing Officer, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, D. Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
