Cases 1 - 10 of 83
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2023cv17721
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NORRIS v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI FOREST
as 2:2023cv00635
Petitioner:
CALVIN NORRIS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FOREST COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI FOREST and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard Thompson v. C. Sears, et al
as 22-2860
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
C. SEARS, SERGEANT R. DEFAZIO, M. LANG, Hospital Adminstrator and others
Eric Norris v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 22-2746
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC D. NORRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
BAKER v. CROOKUS et al
as 2:2021cv04615
Plaintiff:
KEEGAN GABRIEL BAKER
Defendant:
CO' CROOKUS, CO' STRAWTHER, SGT. STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2021cv17348
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POSTIE v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2021cv00316
Defendant:
SHANE DADY, MR. NORRIS, MR. HAMILTON and others
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK A. POSTIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JOHNSON v. HILL et al
as 2:2021cv00300
Defendant:
THORNTON, CT. COLLINS, KYLE MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv04197
Plaintiff:
NORRIS JACKSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BRYANT v. HICKS et al
as 3:2020cv06697
Defendant:
T. PHILLIPS, DAVE RICHARDS, OFC. PINTO and others
Plaintiff:
SHAKEEM T. BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
