Cases 21 - 30 of 265
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LAZARON v. TOWNSHIP OF FAWN et al
as 2:2020cv01285
Defendant:
DAVID A. NORRIS, SR., TIMOTHY MAYBERRY, CHARLES VENESKY and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH F. LAZARON, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv04197
Plaintiff:
NORRIS JACKSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03327
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PITTS et al v. CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv00206
Plaintiff:
MR. KORRY PITTS, MRS. KIMBERLEY PITTS and 412 MOTORING, LLC
Defendant:
SEAN CONROY, GARY NORRIS, CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norris v. Eldred et al
as 3:2020cv00054
Defendant:
Mary Eldred and Stephen Eldred
Plaintiff:
Brenda Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norris et al v. Fruhwith et al
as 1:2019cv02053
Defendant:
Camp Hill Borough, Officer Joshua L. Fruhwith and Joshua L. Fruhwirth
Plaintiff:
Emily Norris and Zachery P. Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaramillo et al v. City of Coatesville et al
as 2:2019cv04936
Defendant:
Maranatha Evangelistic Temple Church, City of Coatesville, Linda Lavendar-Norris and others
Plaintiff:
Fuel City, LLC, Charles Jaramillo, Hot Stylez Boutique, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN, P.A. v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY GENERAL PURPOSE AUTHORITY
as 5:2019cv01314
Plaintiff:
NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN, P.A.
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY GENERAL PURPOSE AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NUNEZ v. NORRIS et al
as 5:2019cv00408
Defendant:
WARDEN JANINE L. QUIGLEY, MATTHEW CORNELL, DAVID KOPE and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE ENRIQUE NUNEZ, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
