Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Jahagirdar et al v. The Computer Haus NC, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Shailesh Jahagirdar, Allen Allen, Kamri Norris and others
Defendant:
The Computer Haus NC, Inc. a North Carolina Corporation doing business as CityMac, Troy Curran, Ocean Tech, Inc. a Delaware corporation doing business as CityMac and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
NORRIS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00341
Petitioner:
JONATHAN MORRISON NORRIS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ford v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Pitt County Memorial Hospital Inc. d/b/a ECU Health Inc., a/k/a Vidant Medical Center, Claudia E. Goettler, Michael R. Bard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Norris v. Drischler
as 5:2024ct03010
Plaintiff:
Ricky Norris
Defendant:
K. Drischler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
NORRIS v. DRISCHLER
as 1:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
RICKY NORRIS
Defendant:
K. DRISCHLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
NORRIS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00874
Plaintiff:
TASHA LYNNE NORRIS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
