Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Crisco v. Stolle et al
as 2:2016cv00530
Plaintiff:
Corey Crisco
Defendant:
Kenneth Stolle, Ms. Norris and K.M. Bowens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris, Jr. v. USA
as 2:2016cv00290
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Eugene Ray Norris, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Madden v. Franzen et al
as 2:2016cv00297
Plaintiff:
Keon Jamall Madden
Defendant:
Franzen, Knewgen, Barbara Meade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Combs v. Palmer, et al
as 2:2016cv00099
Plaintiff:
Kevin Combs
Defendant:
(John Doe) "Palmer, Captain (John Doe) "Norris, 1-14 John/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elliott v. Higgs et al
as 3:2016cv00004
Plaintiff:
Stephen B. Elliott
Defendant:
Joseph Higgs, Jr., Phil Grimes, Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beasley v. Davis et al
as 3:2015cv00779
Plaintiff:
Norris Beasley
Defendant:
Billy Davis, Tommy Pruitt and Levi Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williford et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 3:2015cv00683
Plaintiff:
Nicole Williford and Norris Williford, Sr.
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dickson v. FBI Newport News field office, John/Jane Doe(s) Technical agent(s) et al
as 4:2015cv00124
Plaintiff:
John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant:
FBI Newport News field office, John/Jane Doe(s) Technical agent(s), City of Hampton Virginia Police Division's Homeland Security Unit Technical Police officer(s) John/Jane Doe(s), City of Newport News Virginia police department Technical Police officer(s) John/Jane Doe(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Meade v. Norris
as 2:2015cv00319
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Charles Meade
Defendant:
Captain Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankins v. Oxley et al
as 1:2015cv00496
Plaintiff:
Keith Allen Rankins
Defendant:
C. S. Oxley, Dwayne Williams and Houston Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
