Cases 1 - 6 of 6
County of Santa Clara, et al v. USHHS, et al
as 21-70558
Petitioner:
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST and others
Respondent:
NORRIS COCHRAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Health and Human Services and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
County of Santa Clara et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 5:2021cv01655
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Norris Cochran
Plaintiff:
Center for Science in the Public Interest, County of Santa Clara, National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Ketchikan Indian Community v. Cochran et al
as 3:2021cv00028
Defendant:
Norris Cochran, Elizabeth Fowler and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Ketchikan Indian Community
Providence Regional Medical Center Everett et al v. Cochran
as 2:2021cv00122
Plaintiff:
MultiCare Health System, Providence Little Company of Mary Medical Center Torrance, Valley Medical Center and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services and Norris Cochran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00395
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pediatric and Family Medical Foundation et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 2:2017cv00732
Plaintiff:
Pediatric and Family Medical Foundation, Pediatric and Family Medical Foundation doing business as Eisner Pediatric and Family Medical Center, Ian Brent Tilley, M.D. and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, -, Norris Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
