Cases
Fund Texas v. Paxton
as 22-50889
Plaintiff / Appellee: Fund Texas Choice, North Texas Equal Access Fund, Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant / Appellant: Ken Paxton, in his Official Capacity of Attorney General
Ken PaxtonIn re: Ken Paxton
as 22-50882
Petitioner: In re: Ken Paxton
Respondent: North Texas Equal Access Fund, Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity, Frontera Fund and others
Fund Texas Choice et al v. Paxton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff: Fund Texas Choice, The North Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant: Ken Paxton, Susan R. Deski, Julie Renken and others
Amicus Curiae: Physicians For Reproductive Health, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
NORTH TEXAS EQUAL ACCESS FUND et al v. AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00728
Plaintiff: NORTH TEXAS EQUAL ACCESS FUND and LILITH FUND FOR REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY
Defendant: AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
North Texas Equal Access Fund et al v. Thomas More Society We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01399
Plaintiff: North Texas Equal Access Fund and Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity
Defendant: Thomas More Society
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-50792
Plaintiff / Appellee: Whole Woman's Health, on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, Alamo City Surgery Center, P.L.L.C., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as Alamo Women's Reproductive Services, Brookside Women's Medical Center, P.A., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as Brookside Women's Health Center and Austin Women's Health Center and others
Defendant / Appellant: Judge Austin Reeve Jackson, Penny Clarkston, Mark Lee Dickson and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
In re: Penny Clarkston
as 21-50708
Petitioner: In re: Penny Clarkston and Mark Lee Dickson
Respondent: Whole Woman's Health, on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, Alamo City Surgery Center, P.L.L.C., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as Alamo Women's Reproductive Services, Brookside Women's Medical Center, P.A., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as Brookside Women's Health Center and Austin Women's Health Center and others
Whole Woman's Health et al v. Jackson et al Featured Case
as 1:2021cv00616
Plaintiff: Whole Woman's Health, Alamo City Surgery Center PLLC on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients doing business as Alamo Women's Reproductive Services, Alamo Women's Reproductive Services and others
Defendant: Judge Austin Reeve Jackson, Penny Clarkston, Mark Lee Dickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whole Woman's Health Alliance et al v. Ken Paxton et al
as 1:2018cv00500
Defendant: David Escamilla, Larry R. Faulkner, PH.D., Scott Freshour and others
Plaintiff: Fund Texas Choice, Bhavik Kumar, M.D., M.P.H., Lilith Fund, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?