Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Woodley Tribal Trust Decendants v. Gallaspy Charitable Trust No 1 et al
as 5:2019cv01278
Defendant:
Anadarko US Offshore L L C, Swepi L P - Partnership, Vine Oil & Gas Haynesville L L C and others
Plaintiff:
Mathew Woodley Tribal Trust Decendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv01429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gary Perrin v. Nabors Well Services Co et al
as 2:2011cv09410
Defendant:
Does and Nabors Well Services Co
Plaintiff:
Gary Perrin
Dixon v. Nabors Well Services Co.
as 3:2011cv00377
Plaintiff:
Jeremy A. Dixon
Defendant:
Nabors Well Services Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
James Mulcahy v. Nabors Well Services Co.
as 10-35498
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES MULCAHY
Defendant - Appellant:
NABORS WELL SERVICES CO.
Mulcahy v. Nabors Well Services Co.
as 1:2010cv00021
Plaintiff:
James Mulcahy and James Mulcahy
Defendant:
Nabors Well Services Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Atel Maritime Investors, LP et al v. Sea Mar Management, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv01700
Plaintiff:
Atel Maritime Investors, LP, Atel Maritime Investors, III LP and Kala Kane, LLC
Defendant:
Sea Mar Management, LLC, Nabors Well Services Co and Nabors Industries, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fortenberry v. Nabors Offshore Corporation et al
as 4:2007cv02908
Plaintiff:
A. D. Fortenberry
Defendant:
Nabors Offshore Corporation, Nabors Offshore Drilling, Inc., Nabors Industries LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
